Geodesign, Planning Support Systems and Metaplanning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1828-5961/3407Keywords:
Planning Support Systems (PSS), Geodesign, MetaplanningAbstract
This paper presents the metaplanning approach as a methodology to design and represent the spatial planning process aiming at improving the spatial planning process effectiveness and transparency. It is argued metaplanning may represent the missing link between Planning Support Systems design and Geodesign, and it may support the design of Planning Support System and its agile implementation along with the design of the planning process. A brief example is given aiming at showing the practical implementation of this approach.
References
Arcidiacono A. (2012). Piani comunali, progetti e VAS in Lombardia: da complicato adempimento a chiaro manifesto di obiettivi. In Valutazione e pianificazione delle trasformazioni territoriali nei processi di governance e e-governance (Zoppi C, a cura di). Franco Angeli, Milano.
Artz M. (2010). GeoDesign: Changing Geography by Design. Direction Magazine. March 11th 2010. http://www.directionsmag.com/articles/geodesign-changing-geography-by-design/122394
Carlucci A., Scorza F., Las Casas G. (2010). ReDO 2.0: un’applicazione del modello ontologico agli strumenti di programmazione e governo dello sviluppo regionale. In Atti della Sesta Conferenza Nazionale INPUT 2010 (Las Casas G., Pontrandolfi G., Murgante B. a cura di). Melfi: Libria. Vol. 2, p. 205-219.
Cockburn A. (2001) Writing Effective Use Cases. Addison-Wesley.
DeBettencourt JS., Mandell MB., Polzin SE., Sauter SL. Schofer JL. (1982). Making planning more responsive to its users: the concept of metaplanning. Environment and Planning A. Vol 14(3), p. 311-322.
Deplano G. (1998). Pianificazione ambientale e gestione del territorio. Forum. Udine.
Emshoff J. (1978). Planning the process of improving the planning process: a case study on meta-planning. Management Science. Vol 4(11), p. 1095-1108.
Fischer T. (200), Reviewing the quality of strategic environmental assessment reports for English spatial plan core strategies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Vol 30, Issue 1, p. 62-69.
Flyvbjerg B. (1998). Rationality and Power: democracy in practice. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (IL), ISBN 0-226-25451-8.
Friis-Christensen A., Ostländer N., Lutz M., Bernard L. (2007). Designing service architectures for distributed geoprocessing: Challenges and future directions. Transactions in GIS. Vol. 11(6), p. 799-818.
Geertman, S. Stillwell J. (Eds.). (2009). Planning support systems best practice and new methods. Springer.
Göçmen A., Ventura S. (2010). Barriers to GIS use in Planning. Journal of American Planning Association. Vol 76 (2), p. 172-183.
Goodchild MF. (1992) Geographical Information Science. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems. Vol 6 (1), p. 31–45.
Goodchild MF. (2012). Twenty years of progress: GIScience in 2010. Journal of Spatial Information Science. Vol 1, p. 3-20.
Harris B. (1989). Beyond geographic information systems. Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol 55(1), p. 85-90.
Hopkins LD., Kaza N., Pallathucheril VG. (2005). Representing Urban Development Plans and Regulations as Data: a Planning Data Model. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. Vol 32 (4), p. 597-615.
Khakee A. (1998). Evaluation and planning: inseparable concepts. Town Planning Review. Vol 69(4).
Klosterman R. (2009), Preface. In Planning Support Systems best practices and new methods (Geertman S., Stillwell J., eds.). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
LeGates R. (2006). GIS in US Urban Studies and Planning Education. Paper presented at the 2006 CalGIS Annual Meeting, 4-7 April, Santa Barbara, CA. http:// http://online.sfsu.edu/nsfgis/download/legates_calgis.pdf
McElvaney S. (2012). Geodesign: case studies in urban and regional planning. Esri Press, Redlands.
Roche S., Goodchild M. (2012) Introduction to the Special Issue on Geodesign. Revue Internationale de Géomatique. Vol 22(3), p.141-143.
Scorza F., Las Casas G. (2010). Ontologia e programmazione dello sviluppo locale: prospettive connesse all’interoperabilità semantica e alla valutazione integrata. In Atti della Sesta Conferenza Nazionale INPUT 2010 (Las Casas G., Pontrandolfi G., Murgante B. a cura di). Vol.2, 193-204. Melfi, Libria.
Stollberg B., Zipf, A. (2008). Geoprocessing services for spatial decision support in the domain of housing market analyses. In Proceedings of the 11th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Girona, Spain.
Yeh AGO., Shi X. (1999). Applying case-based reasoning to urban planning: a new planning-support system tool. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. Vol 26(1), p. 101 – 115.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Michele Campagna
